-
Trump v. Slaughter: The Gorsuch Concurrence and the Administrative State, Part 2
Justice Gorsuch’s Three Important Questions As related in the preceding post, Justice Gorsuch welcomes what he considers a return in Trump v. Slaughter to the traditional constitutional order of governing authority clearly allocated among three separate branches. Yet, he has misgivings of what lies ahead. Confirming the President’s authority to remove agency officials at will as part…
-
Trump v. Slaughter: The Gorsuch Concurrence and the Administrative State, Part 1
As I suggested at the beginning of this series, I think that Trump v. Slaughter has not received the attention it deserves, because of the furor that resulted from the not unexpected, but societally dangerous, birthright citizenship case, Trump v. Barbara, published by the Supreme Court a day later. The press has not much covered Slaughter, so the public…
-
Trump v. Slaughter, Part 5: Congress Challenges the President’s Removal Power in the 20th Century but Loses in the 21st
The Supreme Court’s reaction against the perceived threat to the Constitution posed by the New Deal: Humphrey’s Excutor v. United States. The previous post examined the holding in Myers v. United States, which was a resounding victory for the unitary executive. But the matter was not closed. As already discussed, just nine years after Myers, the Supreme Court in Humphreys…
-
Trump v. Slaughter, Part 4: Congress Challenges the President’s Removal Power in the 19th Century but Loses in the 20th: The Rise and Fall of the Tenure of Office Act
A generation after Andrew Jackson’s conflict with the Whig Party-controlled Senate over the firing of Secretary Duane, the issue of the President’s power to fire subordinates at will flamed up once more, in a clash between President Andrew Johnson and the post-Civil War Congress. Johnson was vice-president when Abraham Lincoln was assassinated. He was a…
-
Trump v. Slaughter, Part 3: The Historical Evolution of the Meaning and Scope of “Executive Power” from George Washington to Andrew Jackson, with the Focus on the President’s Power to Remove Subordinates at Will
Article II is relatively brief, and, as shown, the enumerated powers are often ill-defined. In part, this is due, as Hamilton wrote, to the impossibility of clearly laying out every conceivable exercise of executive power. Flexibility was needed to accommodate varied and unpredictable events, especially because Congress would be a part-time legislature while governing was…
-
Trump v. Slaughter, Part 2: The Textual Roots of the Meaning and Scope of “Executive Power”
The previous post pointed out that the recent case of Trump v. Slaughter raised fundamental questions about the essence of executive power under the Constitution and the foundation of separation of powers for the structure of constitutional government. The text of the Constitution: Article II and the “Executive Power” (or “Vesting”) Clause To address these questions, one…
